A CRA expert was retained by an ergonomic office supply company which had asserted U.S. patents it owns regarding adjustable desktop workplace platforms against a direct competitor. Mr. Duski evaluated the economic and technological comparability of license agreements, the existence and acceptability of potential non-infringing alternatives, and the Georgia-Pacific factors to determine the appropriate reasonable royalty rate that would have resulted from a hypothetical negotiation. Mr. Duski also provided rebuttal expert testimony related to the accused infringer’s claim of lost profits damages related to its asserted counterclaims of tortious interference. He issued three expert reports and sat for deposition.
Recent trends in Rule 702 decisions – 2024
In this CRA Insights, we update the Rule 702 decision trends in last year’s Insights with 2023 data.[1] We also provide descriptions of four specific...