CRA was retained by counsel representing a leading global handset and smartphone manufacturer in an international arbitration related to valuation issues of balancing payments in a broad cross license with another global competitor. CRA provided analysis and rebuttal testimony to the tribunal regarding the non-SEP value contentions of the opposing party’s valuation expert.
Recent federal circuit opinions address the economic domestic industry requirement
Under Section 337, a complainant must demonstrate that a domestic industry relating to each asserted patent either exists or is in the process of being...