CRA provided testimony on behalf of plaintiff in litigation regarding a health plan’s use of MFN clauses with hospitals. CRA identified several mechanisms by which the MFN clauses were likely to reduce competition in this matter and demonstrated that they had historically harmed competitors. CRA also analyzed whether this harm to competition was offset by the procompetitive effects of MFN clauses.
CRA expands its Antitrust Practice with addition of M&A specialist and litigation expert
“I am pleased to welcome Hitesh back to CRA,” said Paul Maleh, President and Chief Executive Officer of Charles River Associates. “He specializes in antitrust...


