CRA was retained by counsel on behalf of a UK based pharmaceutical company as part of a transfer pricing dispute with the IRS. The IRS claimed they were owed additional tax revenue associated with a number of products sold, based on an exceptional marketing effort in the US associated with these products. Dr. Gregory Bell was asked to provide written testimony on pharmaceutical marketing efforts executed by the company. There were a number of drugs at issues but central to the case was the use of a co-promotion deal that made a novel drug very successful. Dr. Bell detailed the marketing strategy for the drugs at issue relative to what was contemporaneous industry standard. This included such activities as DTC, detailing, sampling, CME, and other promotional means.
Highlights from 2024 and looking forward to 2025
In this Insights, our transfer pricing consultants reflect on significant transfer pricing developments in 2024 and anticipate trends for 2025. We begin with...