In a court litigation in the U.S., Dr. Tiago Duarte-Silva examined the data sustaining the plaintiff’s claim and showed that such data were unreliable. He also presented several arguments on why the damages claim was inflated, even if the data had been reliable. The court established that the plaintiff was only entitled to 7% of the total amount claimed. Dr. Duarte-Silva was supported in this matter by Dr. Swati Kanoria.
Smallest saleable patent-practicing unit in life sciences disputes
In this article titled “Smallest saleable patent-practicing unit in life sciences disputes,” author Erin McDermott examines methods for calculating damages in...